Workplace aggression — yelling, making belittling remarks, using threats, or spreading lies or rumors — is a pervasive challenge for organizations that imposes a substantial burden at an astounding annual cost of up to $1.97 trillion. This financial toll includes direct costs associated with medical care expenditures and indirect costs linked to productivity loss due to sickness absence, turnover, and diminished quality of life. Further, employees who experience workplace aggression or merely witness it report thwarted health and decreased performance.
Given its impact, organizations are exploring a number of prevention initiatives. One increasingly popular initiative, bystander intervention, involves training people who witness acts of aggression to intervene. In fact, many governmental and educational institutions are experimenting with mandating bystander intervention. Even where training isn’t mandated, bystanders face pressure to intervene, as reflected in slogans like “If you see something, say something” and the emergence of campaigns encouraging bystanders to transform into “upstanders.”
Bystanders can play a pivotal role in determining outcomes of workplace aggression. Their ability to intervene provides them with the potential to influence the experiences of both perpetrators and targets. Yet intervening is far from straightforward.
When it comes to intervention, bystanders are presented with a spectrum of options that can range from empathetic responses, such as offering support to the target, to more assertive strategies, including confronting the perpetrator. Each of these actions can be consequential for both the original target and the bystander, and not always in a positive way. For instance, many individuals who speak out against perpetrators of aggression experience backlash. This is because when a bystander steps in, it challenges the perpetrator’s perception of themselves as a good person and colleague, triggering a defensive response.
Therefore, the way that bystanders intervene matters. It’s not enough to just tell people to intervene; we need to tell them how to do so in a way that minimizes unintended backlash effects.
Our recent paper offers important guidance for bystanders on how to make their interventions more effective. Here, we’ll review some myths and facts about bystander intervention and discuss how a more thoughtful approach to intervening can reduce wrongdoer defensiveness, leading to a more productive outcome for all involved.
When emotions run high, it can be challenging to assess and respond to a situation objectively, for both the bystander and the perpetrator of aggression. In many situations, it may be wiser to approach the issue after a cooling-off period. This approach is best if the situation feels unsafe, if the bystander is not sure how to respond in the moment, or when their aim is to help the perpetrator recognize their inappropriate behavior.
On the other hand, if there is an immediate threat to the target, swift action may be needed. In such cases, the bystander may need to intervene promptly by either removing the target from harm’s way or diverting the perpetrator’s attention from their harmful actions.
Many individuals may not feel comfortable with direct confrontation, and that’s completely understandable. Instead, there are various nonconfrontational approaches that can help the target or prevent future mistreatment. Supporting the target by offering a listening ear, empathy, and assistance can go a long way in providing comfort and solace. Additionally, reporting the situation to the relevant authorities or HR personnel is a constructive way to ensure the issue is properly addressed, without the need for direct confrontation.
It’s important to highlight that it’s possible to address the perpetrator in a constructive way. One method is offering the wrongdoer an opportunity to “save face” by addressing the issue privately and empathetically. This creates a more supportive environment, encouraging perpetrators to grow and learn from their mistakes instead of putting them on the spot and making them feel attacked. Of course, such constructive approaches only make sense if the perpetrator has not yet caused damage to the target and there is still a way for them to make amends.
Trust, closeness, and prior interactions can influence the way your intervention is received. If you have a close and trusting relationship with the wrongdoer, it may be possible to engage in a candid and private conversation to address their behavior. On the other hand, if your relationship is more distant or strained, involving a trusted mediator or supervisor may be a more effective approach.
It’s crucial to acknowledge that individuals with more authority and influence can enact change by imposing consequences or setting new standards. The absence of deterrents, such as the threat of sanctions, can create a vacuum where individuals may regress to their former, harmful behaviors.
However, relying solely on power can be risky, as it may not result in long-term behavioral change. For sustained transformation, it’s critical that entrenched organizational norms promote civil interactions and signal intolerance of aggressive behaviors. A broader cultural evolution provides a more resilient foundation for long-term, positive change.
Interventions can be unpredictable and do not always lead to success. Recognizing the diverse approaches to interventions, and the importance of understanding the individual at the center of the issue, is key to implementing strategies that have a higher likelihood of success.
Our research emphasizes this pivotal shift from a bystander to a perpetrator focus. Understanding how a perpetrator might receive an intervention, and acting in ways that maximize the potential for them to receive it constructively, will help ensure interventions are more successful. Embracing a proactive and informed approach to bystander intervention holds the key to not only addressing workplace mistreatment but also cultivating environments conducive to growth, collaboration, and sustained success.
Source: https://hbr.org/2024/01/how-to-intervene-when-you-witness-workplace-aggression?ab=at_art_art_1x4_s03
All Rights Reserved | Capital personnel
Powered with 💛 by Shazamme